"Take It Off" switches players

[squarepeg]

We've noticed on a few occasions (but not always) that the person landing on the "Take it off" square is not the one instructed to remove something. Is this a new feature or a bug? ver 1.5.2 bld 14211

[Don]

Hi,

In 1.5 we did throw in a few take it off actions where the roles were reversed. We thought it added a little bit of extra spice and surprise to the game.

Do you like it this way, or do you think it was a bad idea?

Thanks,

Don

[squarepeg]

On any given "roll of the die" you never know where you'll land, so I don't see that this impairs the flow of the game. By the same token it doesn't really add to it either. It is slightly confusing : whose turn is it, didn't you just roll, etc. Guess my vote would be to revert, mainly to avoid confusion.

[hawkf14]

squarepeg,

Sorry I have to disagree with you here. I like it that you never know who is going to have to take something off.

The only time it has ever bothered me was when one of us was nude and the other was almost still completely clothed. :?

[blissful thinking]

Don said: We thought it added a little bit of extra spice and surprise to the game.
We agree. We vote for leaving it that way.

[squarepeg]

Well fortunately due to good design work and the action editor, we can all be happy. If we choose not to like the switched roles (subject/partner) in some actions, we can locate those actions and switch them back or leave them out. Everybody's happy, yea!