Regarding the Intent of the request which is the addition of a new tag:
Read the basic 800 actions.
The ones that are for female, have referenced pronouns, and breast/chest as variables explicitly. To follow the programming style, the only logical conclusion would be to include the "vagina" in the reference.
The ones that are for male, have referenced pronouns, and breast/chest as variables explicitly. To follow the programming style, the only logical conclusion would be to include the "penis" in the reference.
The ones that are non-specific, again, read them! Drizzle chocolate sauce on genitals and clean it off? Non-specific, then you would NOT use the requested <sg> or <pg> tag. This is similar to when you refer to partners belly instead of breast, the programming would be "belly" for belly, and <pb> or <sb> for breast.
If you are largely writing your own actions without following the programming style outlined in the BasicActions and the built in syntax checker, then you are right, it doesn't work.
Regarding how to refer to parts of the anatomy
The "dirty talk" check box isn't necessary. In writing, perhaps we can use medical terms, but in the heat of the moment, many use much different moods. The check box I requested isn't necessary, because I can use poor programming style (brute force), and double the actions, making one female and one male, and write it out the way I like to see it.
The point of the technical and feature request forum I don't think is really to argue which camp we are in at what point during our play. There are some in the "initiate coitus now" camp, and some in the "fu** me now baby" "or shove your co** into me" camp.
The check box would make it flexible, and the variable with the clinical terms would appear for you, and other terms would appear for me, and we would BOTH be happy.
The point of the game is flexibility, and the request was made to Don. If Don determines there is more need that just mine, and he can tuck the request, great, if not, I'll revert to brute force.
Kevin
